The phrase "adjusted for usage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing modifications or changes made to something based on how it is utilized or applied in practice.
Example: "The data was adjusted for usage to ensure that the results accurately reflected real-world conditions."
Alternatives: "modified for application" or "tailored for use".
Analyses on aspirin, coxib or acetaminophen users were also adjusted for usage of other NSAIDs.
To account for the lack of CO samples during earlier times, NIOSH/NCI used a second surrogate, HP (adjusted for usage), and divided by CFM (mine exhaust rate) to estimate levels of the surrogate CO.
The information we received regarding the HP and mine exhaust rates consisted of mine- and year-specific estimates of HP, adjusted for usage, HP from diesel equipment purchased after 1990 (to account for potentially less CO emission from this equipment), and air exhaust rates.
e Model 3: adjusted for age, tobacco usage, and BMI.* P < 0.05.
Sensitivity analyses for weekly consumption amongst responders-only when adjusting for app usage and user characteristics showed a similar pattern of results (Supplementary Table 4).
Sensitivity analyses for change in AUDIT score amongst responders-only when adjusting for app usage and participant characteristics showed the same pattern of results (Supplementary Table 6).
When adjusting for app usage, there was the same pattern of results for 'ease of use'recommendationion' and 'satisfaction' though no main effect of Self-monitoring and Feedback on 'helpfulness' (F = 2.14, p = 0.15).
Adjusting for this, usage in California could be as much as 25%to33%3% higher than in Colorado and Montana, which would put it well over 3% of the population (1,125,000).
After adjusting for NSAIDs usage, the patients had a higher HR in this group, as shown in table 5.
Further adjusting for tobacco usage and BMI revealed increased odds ratio of metabolic syndrome in men only (Q4 vs. Q1, 6.15 (3.71 - 10.21) and 2.66 (1.39 - 5.11), p ≤ 0.001 for models 2 and 3, respectively); a significantly increased odds ratio was only seen in model 2 for women (Table 4).
Multivariate logistic regression was performed to study the relationship between any usage of CAMs (outcome), asthma control and controller medication usage, adjusted for potential confounders.
