The phrase "adjusted for reported" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where data or figures are modified based on reported values or information, often in statistical or financial discussions.
Example: "The final results were adjusted for reported discrepancies in the initial data set."
Alternatives: "modified for reported" or "corrected for reported".
In the data from cases, we also adjusted for reported vitamin D supplementation.
Models stratified by reported allergies were not adjusted for reported allergies.
We also adjusted for reported renal impairment in the secondary analysis in an effort to proxy Cd-induced renal tubular damage that may indirectly result in low BMD and osteoporosis through secondary effects on bone (Chen et al. 2006; Jarup et al. 2000).
Among children < 5 years of age, the adjusted incidence was 63% higher when antibiotic use was defined by serum antimicrobial activity (17.9 versus 11.0 per 100,000 person-years [95% CI for observed incidence = 7.0, 16.3]), 9.6% higher when adjusted for reported antibiotic use, and 18% higher when adjusted for antibiotic exposure defined as either reported use or serum antimicrobial activity.
The dependent variable is BMI adjusted for reporting error.
Analyses on AIDS diagnoses were adjusted for reporting delay and missing risk factor information [4], [12], [13].
Odds ratios for comparison with no antiepileptic drug additionally adjusted for reporting centre.
The strengths of this study relate to the fact that our VCT use data were documented rather than self-reported, and we were able to adjust for reported use of HIV counselling and testing services outside of sero-surveys, which should have helped to reduce levels of measurement error and residual confounding.
In conclusion, in a sample of 172 recently released male prisoners, we found that self-reported criminal record discrimination by healthcare workers was associated with increased ED utilization after adjusting for reported racial/ethnic discrimination and other potential confounders.
Second, dietary data were not available, so we were not able to adjust for reported daily consumptions of vitamin C, calcium, and iron, which have been reported to be associated with higher blood lead levels (Louis et al. 2003, 2005a).
Because several of the areas included in these analyses did not have name-based HIV reporting for the time required to calculate adjustment weights for reporting delays, analyses are not adjusted for reporting delays.
