Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In an analysis that adjusted for report of new sex partner with a history of BV, detection of any of BVAB1, BVAB2, BVAB3, P. lacrimalis, Leptotrichia species, Atopobium species, G. vaginalis Megasphaera-1, and L. crispatus remained significantly associated with BV acquisition.
Similar(59)
Because several of the areas included in these analyses did not have name-based HIV reporting for the time required to calculate adjustment weights for reporting delays, analyses are not adjusted for reporting delays.
The dependent variable is BMI adjusted for reporting error.
Analyses on AIDS diagnoses were adjusted for reporting delay and missing risk factor information [4], [12], [13].
Models stratified by reported allergies were not adjusted for reported allergies.
Odds ratios for comparison with no antiepileptic drug additionally adjusted for reporting centre.
In the data from cases, we also adjusted for reported vitamin D supplementation.
According to information provided by the respective national contact points the data reported to ECDC or published elsewhere were adjusted for reporting delays.
† adjusted for reporting status (all cases vs self reported cases only), age at diagnosis (<48,48-65,>65), tradiation(radiation, chemo, surgery - yes/no), education (<12, 12, >12), marital status (yes/no), total calories (continuous), pack years (median = 18.5), and age at first alcoholic drink (<18,18-20,>20).
We also adjusted for reported renal impairment in the secondary analysis in an effort to proxy Cd-induced renal tubular damage that may indirectly result in low BMD and osteoporosis through secondary effects on bone (Chen et al. 2006; Jarup et al. 2000).
The strengths of this study relate to the fact that our VCT use data were documented rather than self-reported, and we were able to adjust for reported use of HIV counselling and testing services outside of sero-surveys, which should have helped to reduce levels of measurement error and residual confounding.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com