The phrase "adjust choices" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to modifying or changing options or decisions in a particular context.
Example: "In order to improve the user experience, we need to adjust choices based on feedback from our customers."
Alternatives: "modify options" or "alter selections".
Within this hypothesis, emotions do not necessarily interfere with rational decision making, and on the contrary they may implement it: they are a way of evaluating past outcomes to adjust choices in the future.
Motor cortical and parietal cortex neurons showed firing rates that vary depending on the specific outcomes of prior choices (e.g. Marcos et al., 2013), and it has been shown that rats adjust choices based on the delay imposed on prior trials (Mazur, 1988; Cardinal et al., 2002).
They were also without effect on the ability to adjust choice behaviour in response to a change in reinforcer value, a capacity that requires interaction between the amygdala and frontal lobe.
By applying the paracontrolled calculus introduced by Gubinelli et al. [8], [9], we show that two approximations have the common limit under the properly adjusted choice of renormalization factors for each of these approximations.
This confirms that people are aware of the different impressions that different images confer and adjust their choices to fit the particular context.
Participants were told that they had to adjust their choices in order to maximize their wins.
The fact that the animals failed to make more what-where-when choices than expected by chance, means they failed to integrate the unique trial locations of both foods (what is where), together with the time passed since caching (when), and adjust their choices accordingly for either the preferred food types (after the short interval) or the present food types (after the long interval).
Theory also predicts that when males are readily available, either because of a male-biased sex ratio or high population densities, females will adjust their choices to reflect search costs and can afford to be more selective [ 15, 21– 23].
In the shop, participants had the self-selected commodities registered in a web-based computer application designed for the study in order to check that the composition of foods was consistent with the prescribed diet (e.g. in terms of energy composition, geographic origin of commodities, organic or not, etc)., and if not, they were told to adjust their choices.
People acted more rationally by reducing their stated value for a lottery, or if monetary adjustments are impossible they adjust their choice away from the lottery.
Alternative dummy choices adjust the outcome of choice experiments, and in such a way that an obviously better option is chosen less often.
