The phrase "adjust assessments" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the process of modifying or changing evaluations or measurements, often in an educational or professional context.
Example: "In order to improve student learning outcomes, we need to adjust assessments to better reflect their understanding of the material."
Alternatives: "modify evaluations" or "revise assessments".
Among the roughly 200,000 parcels in Lucas County, Ohio, 7,083 owners requested reassessments in 2007, about 10 times the yearly average, said Anita Lopez, the assessor, who ran for office on a campaign to adjust assessments.
Examiners should be aware that students tailor their learning to what they are tested on, and adjust assessment accordingly.
We also collected any assessment of the relation between outcome (body weight, body mass index, or waist circumference) and total fat intake, and the most adjusted and any non-energy adjusted assessments.
Unadjusted analyses resulted in mean between-group cost differences similar to those found in the adjusted assessments.
Next to the structural changes, clinicians provided suggestions about adding, removing, and adjusting assessment items.
On average, approximately 6%% of the panel took the opportunity to adjust their assessments in round two (Table 4).
As long as a school complies with federal regulations, it is the school districts' discretion to adjust their assessments to match the wide range of emergent reading skills in Kindergarten classrooms.
Path analysis will be constructed to adjust these assessments of longitudinal changes using groups of covariates (disease and treatment variables; demographic variables; social support; and pre-existing mental health variables).
If there are virus traits that correlate with genetic markers observed to increase risk in humans, or that can be computationally inferred from genetic sequence data, it could be possible to monitor those markers in surveillance and adjust risk assessments prior to emergence in humans.
In particular, they seemed to have difficulties with the contents of their assessments, with the reasons for doing assessments, and with adjusting their assessments in keeping with LAR communicative aspirations.
The logic of this approach can be generalised to other academic integrity issues (see Hodgkinson et al., 2015), potentially arming other academics to adjust the assessment opportunity structures within their units to reduce the suitability for contract cheating.
