The phrase "adjudicate conflicts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a decision or judgment is needed to resolve disputes or disagreements between parties.
Example: "The mediator was called in to adjudicate conflicts between the two departments over resource allocation."
Alternatives: "resolve disputes" or "settle disagreements".
How should we adjudicate conflicts between the earlier and the current individual in such cases?
Such a Research Policy Board, the report argues, would be able to head off problems before they arise as well as remove current logjams and adjudicate conflicts.
But since the resulting interpretation lacks an overarching structure, it has few theoretical resources to adjudicate conflicts between different values, and it may become quite unclear what the view says about particular difficult cases.
Take Rotberg's desired "strong institutions to regulate and adjudicate conflicts" as another key example.
Rotberg's key indicators to avoid state fragility/failure are listed as good security, strong institutions to regulate and adjudicate conflicts, rule of law, ease of doing business, political participation and social service delivery, including good infrastructure and regulation of the economy.
A nurse was chosen to adjudicate conflicts among the primary reviewers and to confirm accuracy of the chart reviews because this person would be less likely to be biased in interpreting the utility of the kidney biopsy procedures.
But while there has been cooperation on extracting the region's oil, gas and mineral deposits, and exploiting its fisheries, there has been little effort to develop legal mechanisms to prevent or adjudicate conflict.
On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach.
But the worry about relativism, that it leaves us with no rational way to adjudicate conflict, seems to apply equally to Rorty's ethnocentric view.
This should be based on empirical data about people's beliefs, including which public health outcomes and public goods should be prioritized and why; how to adjudicate conflicting claims and preferences; and what levels and types of evidence should be privileged in these decisions.
There are some, however, such as William Whewell (here as in the philosophy of science his arch opponent) or Immanuel Kant, or, later, idealists such as T. H. Green, who claim that there are objective criteria for adjudicating conflicts.
