Sentence examples for adjective scale from inspiring English sources

In a typical study, subjects are asked to indicate, by locating themselves on a 9- or 10-point adjective scale, the intensity of a feeling or sensation.

Table 2 Factor loading of each adjective scale for each factor.

The category of "no acceptance" had a dominating share in the adjective scale, that category was chosen by the majority of respondents.

Following the grouping of AIS scores and the transformation into an adjective scale, it is evident that almost all responses (94%) fell into the category of "no acceptance for illness" (Table  3).

Responses were provided on a five-point unipolar adjective scale, with 1 corresponding to "not at all", 2 to "a little bit", 3 to "moderately", 4 to "very" and 5 to "extremely".

Responses were provided on a five-point unipolar adjective scale, in which 1 corresponded to "not at all", 2 to "a little bit", 3 to "moderately", 4 to "very" and 5 to "extremely".

In each experiment, subjects evaluated the sound environment presented, which consisted of combinations of three individual sounds of road traffic, singing crickets and the murmuring of a river, with five bipolar adjective scales such as Good Bad, Active Calm and Natural Artificial.

The contrasting adjectives remain the same for each concept scored, and were chosen from the evaluative adjective scales (Osgood et al, 1971).

Accordingly, generalized affect was measured with three broadly evaluative bipolar adjective scales, for example, "I feel that climate change is" (very unpleasant pleasant, unfavorable favorable, and negative positive).

In other words, the required implementation of mapping function of four  (4) adjective scales of Makgeolli abstracted and measured from TS-5000z, and in order to verify these brainwaves of panels are used as in Figure 9.

Attitudes were rated using the seven-point bipolar Semantic Differential adjectives scales described by Osgood (unsatisfied satisfied, difficult easy, or unbearable bearable). Data were double-entered and validated by Epidata 3.1, and analyzed using R Software version 2.15.1, 2012 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).