Franklin released a glut of records through the early-to-mid-1960s early-to-mid-1960s early-to-mid-1960s early-to-mid-1960sen could capture the fullness of her voice.
We thus predict lowest responses to adjacent neighbour songs, intermediate responses to distant neighbour songs and high responses to stranger songs.
We showed previously that males spatially categorized adjacent neighbour songs ([35], see also [36], and [32], [37] for other songbird species with similar repertoire size as the skylark).
In this situation, we observed a trend towards a stronger response to the distant neighbour song than to the adjacent neighbour song that a larger sample size might be able to detect (Fig. 3).
She reserves some of her most idiosyncratic work for an adjacent pair of songs about socioeconomic inequality.
Leaning over long tables of half-eaten sulguni cheese, they clinked their wineglasses and toasted to "Georgia!" and "Victory!" The warbling voices of a band of Ossetian folk musicians in peasant-style black robes could be heard in an adjacent room, their songs striking a similarly triumphant theme.
We positioned the loudspeaker on the ground at approximately 5 m from the boundary within the subject's territory, on the side shared with the adjacent neighbour whose song was used as a stimulus.
In this case, we predicted that his response to a neighbour song would not be related to the distance to the territory of the bird singing this song, inducing a similar response to adjacent and distant neighbour songs.
We expect similar responses to adjacent and distant neighbour songs, regardless of the distance to these neighbours, and higher responses to stranger songs.
To investigate this question, we played back to male skylarks (Alauda arvensis) songs of adjacent neighbours, distant neighbours established a few territories away in the same microdialect area and strangers.
Responses to adjacent and distant neighbour songs were not significantly different and not related to the distance to the territory of the neighbour, thus lending support to our second hypothesis.
