Sentence examples for adhesion classification from inspiring English sources

Indeed, wide variations exist in adhesion classification and surgical approaches, making comparison between the published evidence difficult.

Comparisons were drawn between cells cultured on grooved and planar substrates and significance tested by statistical analysis of focal adhesion classification (FX, FA, SMA), proportions (%FX, %FA, %SMA) and total adhesion numbers.

As prostate cancer progresses to more advanced stages there is a depletion of stromal cells from the tissue and this perhaps explains the dominant contribution from downregulated muscle-associated genes to the signature and also other features of pathway enrichments particularly of the focal adhesion classification [ 23].

The variation in adhesion classifications, mode of application of agents, lack of uniformity in surgical approaches and variations in the interpretation of results all make the assessment of the efficacy of the many agents difficult and almost impossible to compare.

It provides a real-time view of the cavity, enabling accurate description of location and degree of adhesions, classification, and concurrent treatment of IUAs [8].

101, 103 Using adhesion domain classification, interstrain sequence comparisons have revealed a small number of tandem domain arrangements of 2 4 domains, called domain cassettes (DC), which are unusually conserved between parasite genotypes.

Three studies [ 7, 29, 45] reported the stages of adhesion using 2 classification systems; however, several studies [ 8, 12, 19, 30– 37, 37, 42, 43] did not provide any information of the classification system used.

At a critical distance, we achieved the highest degree of adhesion in ASTM pattern classification.

Table 1 Classification of intrauterine adhesions Source Summary of classification March et al. [7] Adhesions classified as minimal, moderate, or severe based on hysteroscopic assessment of the degree of uterine cavity involvement.

According to the phylogenetic analysis of the entire human GPCR repertoire, five subfamilies make up the GRAFS classification system: Glutamate, Rhodopsin, Adhesion, Frizzled/Taste2 and Secretin[ 2].

Surgeons who were blinded to the patient's self-reported pain data completed the American Fertility Society classification for endometriosis and adhesions on the basis of observed physical disease.