Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
We then separate individuals who were recruited by the job assignment system into two groups—'job-assignment adherents' (adherents hereafter) refers to individuals who got assigned jobs by strictly following the state's formal recruitment procedure, whereas 'job-assignment networkers' (networkers hereafter) refers to those who got assigned jobs more or less through help of social contacts.
Statistical analysis was carried out on key indicators playing a role in adherence amongst the adherent and non-adherent population.
The aim was to identify initially non-adherent patients and to investigate initially non-adherent and initially adherent patients' adherence over time.
The binary variable of daily adherence, non-adherent versus adherent, was transferred into a relative variable.
The outcome was adherence; with participants classified as adherent, or non-adherent.
In our study, the adherence assessments for non-adherent and adherent patients were unequal.
The median number of adherence assessments for non-adherent and adherent patients were 6.9 and 10.3 respectively.
Both measures of ART adherence (i.e., the VAS past-month dose adherence and the AACTG 4-day time adherence) were dichotomized into non-adherent and adherent.
The provision of specific adherence support is associated with enhanced adherence of initially non-adherent patients, whereas initially adherent patients remain adherent for at least six cycles without specific support.
The proportion of bacterial cells adhering to Caco-2 cells was calculated as (adherent cells - cells in last washing)/non-adherent + adherent cells.
An association was found between adherence and the prescription of Beta-2 adrenergic agonists (adherent patients: 76.2%; no adherent patient 23.8%; p = 0.031), xanthine (adherent patients: 20%; no adherent patient 80%; p = 0,019), inhaled corticosteroids (adherent patients: 29.6%; no adherent patient 70.4%; p = 0,066) and mucolytics (adherent patients: 18.2%; no adherent patient 81.8%; p = 0,009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com