Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
In addition, physicians rated two global adherence items (i.e., "Overall, this youth adheres well to the prescribed regimen" and "Overall, this child is capable of adhering to a complex regimen") responding on a scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5== strongly agree (with 3 = neutral) to each item.
The number of adherence items varied between the different course components (table 2).
Item responses for the three adherence items were linearly transformed to a 0 100 scale [ 26, 27].
Intrarater reliability was 91% for adherence items, 75.7% for competence items and 69% for overall impression scores.
Studies reporting questionnaires including items not related to medication adherence (unless medication adherence items form a separate subscale).
A summary of the individual adherence items was calculated as the mean of the three individual items.
Similar(49)
The adherence item on the SCAP-HQ, a health questionnaire developed and validated for the SCAP study [ 23], was used.
Fifteen COPERS components were used to measure inter-rater reliability; they comprised 95 adherence item scores, 71 competence item scores and 15 overall impression scores.
Intrarater reliability was measured using assessments from 16 COPERS components comprising 94 adherence item scores, 64 competence item scores and 16 overall impression scores.
In particular for randomised trials, it is widely recommended that all participants be included in an intention to treat analysis, regardless of adherence (Item 20c).
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) model 1 (ICC(1, n ); see Shrout & Fleiss, 1979) were computed to analyze the inter-rater reliabilities for all items in the competence (CTCS-SP) scale as well as the adherence item and patient difficulty.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com