Exact(41)
We used Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazards estimates to describe time to confirmed virological failure per adherence group, as this method provides a appropriate summary for failure events [11].
Subjects in the good adherence group were older and less deprived compared with the partial adherence group.
Patients with an adherence to SOP >70% were classified into the high adherence group (HAG) and patients with an adherence of <70% into the low adherence group (LAG).
This combination appeared 80% of the time among those in the adherence group, but appeared less than 60% of the time in the non-adherence group.
We identified a good medication adherence group (MPR ≧ 80%) and a poor medication adherence group (MPR < 80%) to conduct statistical analyses [ 19].
Third, we modeled the discontinued group compared with the full adherence group.
Similar(19)
We found no statistically significant differences between baseline characteristics and early adherence groups.
We found no statistically significant differences between baseline characteristics and early adherence groups (Table 1).
Table 2 shows the classification of patients into adherence groups for each adherence measure.
The Strauss Carpenter total score did not differ between adherence groups at baseline.
Itemsets which appear on the left appear in both adherence groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com