The phrase "adequately graded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the assessment or evaluation of work, indicating that it has been graded to a satisfactory level.
Example: "The assignments were adequately graded, ensuring that all students received fair feedback on their performance."
Alternatives: "sufficiently assessed" or "properly evaluated".
But they also stated these tests did not adequately grade the severity of dementia or differentiate mild cases from normal ageing and 'clouded and delirious states' (ibid.: 699).
The short answer grading scheme attempted to account for different ways a question could be answered correctly and was updated if we found a student response which could not be graded adequately using the current rubric.
However, as sampled apiaries contained colonies that were actively collapsing, colonies graded as "adequately strong" or "control" in CCD apiaries could have been at an early, asymptomatic stage of collapse.
Antifibrinolytic therapy should be stopped once bleeding has been adequately controlled (grade 2C).
Antifibrinolytic therapy should be guided by thrombelastometric monitoring if possible and stopped once bleeding has been adequately controlled (Grade 2C).
Where clinicians had not graded toxicity but had adequately described the toxicity, grading was assigned retrospectively using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0.
Many "population-based" registries meet the requirements of an A2 level of evidence (prospective cohort study of sufficient magnitude and follow-up, adequately controlled for "confounding" and no selective follow-up), and were graded as such.
The above strongly suggests that field resilient modulus values obtained using the LRS 10 penetrometer adequately estimate sub-grade stiffness required for design purposes for a given pavement.
In this two-tier grading system, it adequately correlates to conventional FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) grading system and further provides valuable clinical outcome for ovarian cancer patients when compared with FIGO grading system demonstrating high-grade serous carcinoma as the distinct ovarian cancer subtype [ 20].
However, there was general agreement that none of these six prominent approaches to grading the levels of evidence and strength of recommendations adequately addressed all of the important concepts and dimensions that we thought should be considered.
