The phrase "adequately explained by a" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing whether a concept, phenomenon, or situation has been sufficiently clarified or described by a particular source or explanation.
Example: "The results of the experiment were adequately explained by a recent study published in the journal."
Alternatives: "sufficiently clarified by a" or "properly described by a".
A lad of Pakistani origin, from Leeds, travelling to London to blow himself up in a crowd of his fellow countrymen is not adequately explained by a sense of injustice about an invasion of Iraq.
Accordingly, the basic act of belief-formation might be a process that is more adequately explained by a non-propositional theory following Brentano's lines.
Membrane leakage from neutral or negatively charged vesicles at pH 5.0 can be adequately explained by a mathematical model assuming that GALA becomes incorporated into the vesicle bilayer and aggregates to form a transbilayer pore consisting of 10 (±2) peptides.
Lesur et al. (2015) argued that the geomagnetic data could not be adequately explained by a purely toroidal flow, but inclusion of a weak poloidal flow is sufficient to explain the SV, suggesting that the upper part of the core is weakly stratified.
Using whole blood concentrations, the data were adequately explained by a Michaelis Menten absorptive process, which results in increased apparent oral clearance with dose.
However, one might challenge whether the Satisfaction Claim is adequately explained by an appeal to Self-Monitoring and Krasia.
4 11 18–22 A recent survey of UK general practices database records from 2000 to 2009 showed that this underuse of AC therapy in the elderly is not adequately explained by either an increase in comorbidities or in bleeding risk.
Of note, these oncogenic pathways lost independent prognostic significance in multivariate analysis when the profile was included, suggesting that our prognostic classifier is capturing complex phenotypes and that outcome differences in ovarian cancer may not be adequately explained by deregulation of a single oncogenic or signaling pathway.
Species richness was closely linked to life-form percentage cover (mainly to herbaceous plant cover), and life-form cover was adequately explained by satellite data, giving a biophysical support to our predictive models.
The P. falciparum model incorporated environmental predictors and spatial random effects, while P. vivax seroprevalence first-order trends were not adequately explained by environmental variables, and a spatial smoothing model was developed.
In a previous analysis of the population based Anglian Breast Cancer study (Antoniou et al, 2001), we have demonstrated that the familial aggregation of breast cancer can be adequately explained by the effects of BRCA1, BRCA2 and a polygenic component (i.e. a large number of low risk polymorphisms acting multiplicatively).
