The phrase "adequately constituted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to describe something that has been formed or established in a satisfactory or sufficient manner.
Example: "The committee was adequately constituted to address the issues at hand, with members representing various stakeholders."
Alternatives: "properly formed" or "sufficiently established".
Without properly constituted, adequately resourced and consciously independent Ethics Committees, with the requisite skills-mix for scientific and ethical assessment, this proviso may be ineffective in ensuring adequate ethical protections for studies of human exposure to pesticides.
There was also no definition of what constituted an adequately or inadequately dilated pupil.
If it is true that the ALI constitutes a synthetic index of the degree of competition which takes into account also the effect of increased sugar imports, and hence of the possible entry of new operators on the EU market, it should be conceded that it cannot adequately represent the many qualitative aspects which may determine actual competition within the EU sugar sector.
Ideally, the public would be adequately informed, and the POT would be constituted by those among the public who were both knowledgeable and concerned about the issues before it.
How could it fail to be, when it is a vast failed experiment, a "terror prison" that contains few terrorists, a place where innocent men and foot soldiers from someone else's war -- never adequately screened to determine whether they actually constituted a threat to the United States -- have been held for nearly seven years without charge or trial?
The Governing Council as presently constituted is not functional and not adequately representative of the Iraqi people.
This list constituted the initial pool of items to be treated and adequately reduced.
"A failure to prominently and adequately warn consumers could constitute, at the very least, a deceptive trade practice," the letter stated.
Most significantly, they focus primarily on questions about RECs' structure and process, such as how committees are constituted, whether their standard operating procedures are complete, and whether the process of protocol review is adequately documented [ 31].
Those constituted the positives.
