Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "adequate review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the sufficiency or appropriateness of an evaluation or assessment process.
Example: "Before finalizing the report, we need to ensure that there has been an adequate review of all the data collected."
Alternatives: "sufficient evaluation" or "proper assessment".
Exact(34)
Using performance-based incentives (PBI) for VHWs is an approach that has been proposed and implemented in some programs, but has not received adequate review and evaluation in the peer-reviewed literature.
"When a local government believes they cannot do an adequate review of a permit, they can deny the permit based on their need for further review," she said.
"Our belief is that this is an adequate review," said Dr. David Cornblath, a Hopkins neurologist who is a review board member.
"If that becomes law, I would have real concern about the ability of people to get an appropriate and adequate review of adverse decisions by H.M.O.'s.
The city argued that they had done an adequate review, and two lower courts found in favor of the city on all claims.
Take down mechanisms must incorporate adequate review mechanisms for intermediaries and content providers, as well as avoid liability regimes that may lead to over removal of legitimate speech.
Similar(26)
The EFDD said in a statement at the time that it had not authorised or supported the distribution of the books and that the issue would be subject to an internal review and "adequate follow-up".
The Special Rapporteur is of the view that if there is no proper or adequate international review available, national review procedures — even for international lists — are necessary.
Whether the project has been subjected to adequate peer review.
"It will not be adequate to review these documents, expected to be in the thousands of pages, at the agencies.
Tellingly, their effectiveness improved when they gained certification. T.F.A. has called the Stanford study flawed, arguing that its sample sizes were small and questioning whether it was subject to adequate independent review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com