The phrase "adequate reasoning" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the sufficiency or appropriateness of the reasoning behind a decision, argument, or conclusion.
Example: "The committee found that the proposal lacked adequate reasoning to support its claims."
Alternatives: "sufficient justification" or "appropriate rationale".
He added that the decision, which ran counter to the federal government's earlier rejection of the Wyoming plan, "represents an agency change of course unsupported by adequate reasoning".
A major motivation of proof-planning is to bridge the gap between high-level, cognitively adequate reasoning for specific domains, and calculus-level reasoning to ensure soundness.
In the final design of the simulation (used in Iteration 3 and 4) we reduced the number of events (from 26 to 24) and increased the duration (to 15 30 minutes) of pauses to provide more time for adequate reasoning.
In handing down his ruling, Judge Martin Feldman said the Interior Department failed to provide adequate reasoning for the moratorium, saying it appeared to assume that because one rig failed, all companies and rigs doing deepwater drilling pose an imminent danger.
The relevance of HSP in terms of any antiviral effects of LCH is not based on adequate reasoning and very unlikely.
Therefore, to ensure adequate reasoning one must obtain reliable data, look at problems from a different point of view, and pay attention to other contexts [ 27].
She argues that even if the Deferential Wife were a Rawlsian ideal reasoner, making choices under ideal epistemic conditions those of "adequate instrumental reasoning abilities, full and complete information and the capacity to vividly imagine the consequences of her actions" (Babbitt 1993, 247)—she still would not choose autonomy over deference.
Researchers have demonstrated a lack of adequate clinical reasoning skills in new graduate nurses is a factor in critical patient incidents.
The logics thus far are adequate for reasoning about programs that are supposed to terminate and display a certain input/output behavior.
Since story comprehension of cooperative and deceitful scenarios was flawless in all participants, as indicated by the behavioral data, the observed activations most likely reflect adequate belief reasoning in all three task types.
When taking comorbidity into account, adequate clinical reasoning is essential in order to deal with persons with a complex health status.
