The phrase "adequate prevalence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to describe a sufficient or acceptable level of occurrence or frequency of something.
Example: "The study found that there was adequate prevalence of the disease in the population, warranting further investigation."
Alternatives: "sufficient occurrence" or "acceptable frequency."
We demonstrated adequate prevalence of preventive practices against the disease.
Use of transition probabilities that yield adequate prevalence of BeS and CBD with short latencies leads to excessive prevalence of both BeS and CBD in latter years.
Second, no objective standard for cut-off regarding an adequate prevalence of patients receiving individualised caries prevention has been established, although we used prior planned cut-offs with the mean from the previous US studies.
In one measure of adequate staffing — the prevalence of bedsores in patients bedridden for long periods of time — HCA clearly struggled.
Human papillomavirus infection was present in 95 of 710 adequate samples (crude prevalence 13.4%9595% CI: 10.96 16.11%)).
A sample of 200 250 children in each ecologically homogenous area was considered adequate to evaluate prevalence and intensity of Schistosoma infection in a disease-endemic area.
However, without adequate monitoring of prevalence of these conditions, it is no possible to establish the true impact of consumption on unborn children in the UK.
Such data are generally adequate for determining prevalence of comorbidity and survival outcomes, but generally provide limited information on treatment delivery or patient tolerance for treatment regimens.
11 Although a study of NeP in Japanese patients with chronic pain related to spinal disorders suggested that approximately 30% of patients with CLBP have a NeP component, 12 this may represent an underestimate since there were few CLBP patients for adequate estimation of prevalence.
Considering that 10% of those workers have tasks involving direct use of pesticides (mixers, blenders, applicators), with a 95% exposure rate, a minimal sample size of 70 people was considered to be adequate for the prevalence study with 5% margin of error [ 31].
In the paper the researchers state that a sample of 441 was adequate as the prevalence of brucellosis is 8% in high-risk patients in contact with livestock (Abo-Shehada et al., 1996), though their reference for statistical power could not be reviewed.
