The phrase "adequate level of reliability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the sufficiency or acceptability of reliability in a particular context, such as research, technology, or product performance.
Example: "The system must maintain an adequate level of reliability to ensure user satisfaction and safety."
Alternatives: "sufficient reliability" or "acceptable reliability level."
The need to design and construct structural systems with adequate levels of reliability and redundancy is widely acknowledged.
PJM could reduce reserve margins to 13% and still achieve adequate levels of reliability as measured by the 2.4 Loss of Load Hours metric and the 0.001% Unserved Energy metric, which are used by other U.S. and international systems.
To verify the reliability of the scales, Cronbach's alpha test was performed, with the results indicating adequate levels of reliability for Uncertainty (α = .70, if item 10 is deleted), Persistence (α = .79), Helplessness (α = .77), and Fantasy (α = .77, if items 23 and 25 are deleted).
This instrument has demonstrated adequate levels of reliability in previous research [ 33].
The MOS-20 has adequate levels of reliability and validity and was translated into Dutch according to standard forward backward procedures.
Results of these tests revealed adequate levels of reliability when the MDS was first implemented nationally in late 1990.[ 16] A modified version of the MDS was designed and retested in 1995 and was found to have improved in reliability in those areas with less than adequate reliability while sustaining reasonably high reliability in other areas.
Consequently, the maximum imposed load after fire exposure should be assessed based on reliability considerations in order to provide an adequate level of safety.
The reliability of the approach was always very high (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90), with an adequate level of sensitivity.
Based on previous recommendations, a sample size of 400 survivors was considered adequate for factor analysis and estimation of reliability and validity coefficients [ 55- 57], while a sample size of at least 50 participants has been suggested for assessing adequate levels of test-retest reliability [ 24].
All four measures were acceptable, suggesting adequate levels of agreement and reliability (r wg = .85; α = .83; ICC 1 = .67; ICC 2 = .80).80
