The phrase "adequate hearing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the sufficiency or appropriateness of a hearing, such as in legal or medical situations.
Example: "The court ensured that the defendant received an adequate hearing before making a decision on the case."
Alternatives: "sufficient hearing" or "proper hearing".
P. had not given Commerzbank an adequate hearing.
All participants had adequate hearing, (corrected to) normal vision and had no known neurological/psychiatric disorders or current drug abuse.
And I promise I'll keep an open mind about it". Although he doubted Rafferty would be able to convince him, he wanted to make sure that his partner felt he was given an adequate hearing.
The above-quoted portions of the Court of Appeals' decision demonstrate to my satisfaction that the question whether respondent received an adequate hearing is fairly raised by the decision below.
Since Jackson has not been given an adequate hearing upon the voluntariness of his confession he must be given one, the remaining i quiry being the scope of that hearing and the court which should provide it.
There was also failure of an Army medical readiness automation system... to provide unit commanders with information regarding troops having adequate hearing protection.... Finally, there is evidence... that soldiers having blast injuries may not have been referred to audiology for adequate evaluation and treatment".
Plaintiff in error has not had proper op ortunity for an adequate judicial hearing as to confiscation; and unless such an opportunity is now available, and can be definitely indicated by the court below in the exercise of its power finally to construe laws of the state (including of course section 31), the challenged order is invalid.
Also, all drivers were to have adequate visual, hearing, communication and physical capabilities to complete the simulator driving tests/assessment.
Other conditions were adequate training for hearing aid dispensers, that direct hearing aid provision should only be possible for persons of 65 years and older, and that, especially in the beginning, the care should be evaluated frequently.
If the proceeding was an unfair one, as lacking adequate notice, full hearing, or development of all relevant facts, appellant had a remedy provided by the statute, which in the orderly processes of the administration of the law he was bound to pursue.
His lawyers, in their appeals, argued that jurors did not hear adequate testimony about the years of abuse he had suffered as a child.
