adequate fund

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adequate fund" is not correct in standard written English; it should be "adequate funds." You can use it when discussing the sufficiency of financial resources for a specific purpose or project.
Example: "The organization was able to proceed with the project because it secured adequate funds from various donors."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The disadvantage of such a reform is that governments cannot promise existing pensioners, or workers who will soon become pensioners, the guaranteed pension precisely because it is dependent on building up an adequate fund.

The Guardian - Opinion

With right political commitment and adequate fund allocation, young people can fulfill their roles -- and that way make the most effective transformation of the world into a better place for all.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Without adequate funding, however, these laudable initiatives lack teeth.

The Guardian

As Gordon noted above, adequate funding is also important.

The Guardian

"They've decided that they can do the adequate funding, the adequate staffing themselves," he said.

The New York Times

Pension trustees must also oversee decisions on disclosures to the public, and on adequate funding levels.

The New York Times

"The RCM calls for adequate funding for students who are the future of midwifery.

The Guardian

The schools would have adequate funding, he said, "but not the increase they requested".

The New York Times

"These are sticking plaster solutions and no substitute for adequate funding.

The Guardian

The company said that its international operations are expected to have "adequate funding" to continue publishing.

The Guardian

Health and social care need adequate funding to support the needs of an ageing population.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the plural form "funds" when referring to an unspecified amount of money. It is grammatically more appropriate and widely accepted.

Common error

Avoid using the singular form "fund" when you mean a general pool of money. "Fund" is typically used for a specific, named financial instrument or allocation, not a general amount.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequate fund" functions as a noun phrase intended to describe the sufficiency of monetary resources. However, Ludwig AI identifies that the grammatically correct form is "adequate funds".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "adequate fund" is intended to convey the sufficiency of financial resources, but Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "adequate funds". Although the phrase appears in news sources like The Guardian and The New York Times, adhering to standard grammar is crucial, especially in formal contexts. Alternatives such as "sufficient funding" or "ample resources" can also be used. Therefore, while the intent is clear, it's best to use "adequate funds" or similar grammatically correct alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adequate funds

Pluralizes "fund" to match standard English grammar, referring to multiple sources or a general amount of money.

sufficient funding

Replaces "adequate" with "sufficient" and "fund" with "funding", creating a more common and grammatically sound phrase.

sufficient resources

Replaces "fund" with a broader term, "resources", implying not only financial but also other types of means.

ample financial support

Uses "ample" for a stronger sense of adequacy and specifies the type of support as financial.

necessary financial backing

Emphasizes the necessity of the financial support rather than just its adequacy.

requisite capital

Uses more formal terms, "requisite" and "capital", making it suitable for business contexts.

appropriate level of funding

Specifies that the funding needs to be at the right level, not just adequate.

enough money

A very simple and direct way to express the idea of having sufficient financial resources.

sound financial footing

Conveys the idea of stability and security in financial terms, implying adequate funds.

healthy budget

Implies that the budget is well-managed and has sufficient resources.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "adequate fund"?

No, the grammatically correct phrase is "adequate funds". The noun should be plural when referring to an unspecified amount of money.

What is a better alternative to "adequate fund"?

Alternatives include "adequate funds", "sufficient funding", or "sufficient resources", depending on the specific context.

How do I use "adequate funds" in a sentence?

You can use "adequate funds" to describe a situation where there are enough financial resources for a particular purpose. For example: "The project could proceed because it had adequate funds."

What's the difference between "adequate fund" and "adequate funds"?

"Adequate fund" is grammatically incorrect in most contexts. "Adequate funds" is the correct plural form, referring to a sufficient amount of financial resources.