adequacy with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adequacy with" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe the level of appropriateness, suitability, or sufficiency of something in relation to a standard or expectation. Example: The new employee's performance will be evaluated based on their adequacy with the company's guidelines and standards.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

The effect is of individually strained aspiration to adequacy, with not a scintilla of collective energy or interplay in sight.

The New York Times

The adequacy with which an FFQ can provide reliable diet assessment data depends on the integrity of the underlying database.

Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Mathematical models are developed and checked for their adequacy with the F-test, determined quantitatively and presented graphically.

Materials Today: Proceedings

Sure, they have pretensions to adequacy with their recent ascent to chair the UN Security Council, but if the new prime minister can make jokes about sexy women and consider it an effective communications strategy, why can't two developers?

The Guardian - Opinion

Several inventories require that each of a series of statements be placed on a rating scale in terms of the frequency or adequacy with which the statements are judged by the individual to reflect his tendencies and attitudes.

Britannica

The aim is to reconcile generation adequacy with efficient energy purchase, correct risk allocation among investors and consumers, and the politico-economic environment of the country.

Energy Policy

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

Arguably, the most serious difficulties for Anomalous Monism are not with its adequacy but with its justification.

SEP

Econometric cost functions have begun to appear in education adequacy cases with greater frequency.

Stanford University

In fact, we seek TSs which fully satisfy the adequacy criterion, with the idea that they would assure a satisfactory level of fault detection.1.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Within the PN groups, EPN resulted in more optimal intake of calories and proteins, suggesting better feeding adequacy compared with LPN.

Annals of Intensive Care

Whether dialysis adequacy correlated with short-term outcome after ANVUGIB or not could not be answered in current study.

BMC Nephrology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "adequacy with", ensure the context clearly defines the standard or requirement against which adequacy is being measured. For example, specify "adequacy with safety regulations" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "adequacy with" interchangeably with concepts like "excellence" or "optimization". "Adequacy" implies meeting a minimum requirement, not necessarily exceeding it. For goals beyond minimal compliance, use terms that reflect higher achievement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequacy with" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, typically used to describe the degree to which something meets a particular requirement or standard. Ludwig confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

79%

News & Media

12%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Academia

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "adequacy with" is grammatically sound and frequently used, as confirmed by Ludwig. Predominantly found in science, news, and encyclopedia contexts, it assesses how well something meets specific requirements. Alternatives like "sufficient for" or "suitable for" may offer nuanced substitutions. To ensure clarity, specify the standard of adequacy. Avoid conflating it with concepts beyond minimal compliance. This guide aims to clarify the usage of "adequacy with", ensuring precise and effective communication in diverse contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficient for

Replaces "adequacy" with "sufficiency", focusing on whether something meets the required amount or degree.

suitable for

Emphasizes the appropriateness of something for a specific purpose or situation.

appropriate for

Similar to "suitable for", but highlights the correctness or fitting nature of something.

commensurate with

Indicates that something is proportional or equivalent to something else.

consistent with

Highlights the agreement or harmony between two things.

in line with

Suggests that something is conforming or adhering to a particular standard or guideline.

up to par with

Implies that something meets a certain expected level or quality.

in accordance with

Formal way of saying something is in agreement or compliance with rules or guidelines.

meeting the standards of

Focuses on the act of fulfilling established requirements or criteria.

measuring up to

Suggests that something is being evaluated against a benchmark and successfully reaching it.

FAQs

How can I use "adequacy with" in a sentence?

You can use "adequacy with" to describe how well something meets certain standards or requirements. For example, "The study assessed the adequacy with which current policies address climate change."

What are some alternatives to using "adequacy with"?

Alternatives include "sufficient for", "suitable for", or "in line with", depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to use "adequacy with" or "compliance with"?

"Adequacy with" generally implies meeting a minimum standard, while "compliance with" specifically refers to adhering to rules or regulations. Choose the phrase that best fits the context of your sentence.

How does "adequacy with" differ from "effectiveness with"?

"Adequacy with" focuses on whether something is sufficient, while "effectiveness with" emphasizes the degree to which something produces a desired result. The choice depends on whether you're concerned with sufficiency or impact.