The phrase "adequacy value of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the sufficiency or appropriateness of a certain value or measure in relation to a specific standard or requirement.
Example: "The adequacy value of the proposed budget must be assessed to ensure it meets the project's needs."
Alternatives: "sufficiency value of" or "satisfactory value of".
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was highly significant (p < 0.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy value of 0.94, both supporting the factorability of the matrix.
Sixth, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy value of 0.84 (>0.6) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (χ (153) = 2213.83, p < 0.001) indicated that the data were suitable for EFA.
Factorial analysis yielded a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy value of 0.687, and a Chi-square 121.9, 28 df Spherecity Bartlett's Test <0.001; these values led us to conclude that the number of children surveyed was enough to accurately construct the model.
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was highly significant (p <.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy value of.9 supported the factorability of the matrix [ 21].
Factorability of items was shown by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measamplingsadequacyadequacy value of.796, the significance of Bartlett's test of sphericity (χ(105) =658.39, p<.001), and the fact that the communalities were all above.3 (except for item 4).
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO, measure of sampling adequacy) value was 0.777, comfortably exceeding the cut-off value of 0.60 [21] 21].
To investigate validity of the proposed model, the P value, R 2, predicted and adjusted-R 2 and precision adequacy value were calculated (Table 3).
This was confirmed by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) sample adequacy test value of 0.975 and the Bartlett sphericity test, p = 0.001.
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy produced values of 0.808, 0.858, and 0.804, for the Positive, Negative and General Psychopathology subscales, respectively.
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was significant (p <.001) for all three subscales and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy produced values of 0.789, 0.875, and 0.817 for the Positive, Negative and General Psychopathology subscales, respectively.
For the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (KMO) and the individual measure of sampling adequacy (MSA), a value of greater than 0.6 represents an acceptable result [ 26].
