The phrase "adequacy value" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to assessments, evaluations, or measurements of sufficiency or quality.
Example: "The adequacy value of the resources provided was assessed to ensure they met the project's requirements."
Alternatives: "sufficiency measure" or "satisfactory value."
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO, measure of sampling adequacy) value was 0.777, comfortably exceeding the cut-off value of 0.60 [21] 21].
To investigate validity of the proposed model, the P value, R 2, predicted and adjusted-R 2 and precision adequacy value were calculated (Table 3).
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was highly significant (p < 0.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy value of 0.94, both supporting the factorability of the matrix.
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was highly significant (p <.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy value of.9 supported the factorability of the matrix [ 21].
Sixth, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy value of 0.84 (>0.6) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (χ (153) = 2213.83, p < 0.001) indicated that the data were suitable for EFA.
Factorability of items was shown by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measamplingsadequacyadequacy value of.796, the significance of Bartlett's test of sphericity (χ(105) =658.39, p<.001), and the fact that the communalities were all above.3 (except for item 4).
The 30-day irrigation adequacy values, considering all treatments, varied during the testing periods by 0 68 percentile points.
Interobserver agreement was good for distension and diagnostic adequacy (kappa value 0.62 and 0.65).
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy, with value range from 0 to 1, should exceed 0.5 to meet Kaiser's criterion [ 30].
This was confirmed by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) sample adequacy test value of 0.975 and the Bartlett sphericity test, p = 0.001.
All the measures of sampling adequacy (MSA) values were over.78.
