The phrase "adequacy should be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the necessity or requirement of a certain level of adequacy in a specific context, such as standards or evaluations.
Example: "In assessing the project's success, we must ensure that adequacy should be maintained throughout all phases of development."
Alternatives: "sufficiency must be" or "adequacy needs to be".
Therefore, the influence of DR on system security and adequacy should be comprehensively investigated.
Since the project of SA is to develop a constitutional system that defines other notions from a predetermined basis, the question is which conditions of adequacy should be in place for evaluating the definitions.
Whether or not the conditions of explanatory adequacy should be relative to an epistemic context of confirmation rather than to an ontic context of truth would become an important question in coping with the requirements for probabilistic explanations.
This raises questions about how judgments regarding model adequacy should be made based on these multiple p-values.
Tabachnick and Fidell [ 15] have recommended that Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy should be at least 0.60.
More large randomised clinical trials with sufficient study length and dose adequacy should be conducted to provide definitive evidence and have implications for clinical practice.
Regarding EFA, the following were obtained: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin: measures the sampling adequacy, which should be greater than 0.5 for a satisfactory factor analysis to proceed.
Empirical adequacy is typically thought to be the most crucial of these virtues a theory must fit the phenomena and consequently it might be thought that empirical adequacy should always be preferred over other virtues.
The factorability of data was assessed through the Kaiser Meyer Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO), which should be above 0.6 (30), and Bartlett's test of sphericity (31) to be significant (p≤0.05).
It has been suggested that the adequacy of ANC should be operationalized with as many of the following as possible: timing of initiation of ANC, number of visits, adherence to recommended schedule, content of medical care, training of service provider, setting of care, content of educational services, and quality of the ANC system [ 33].
To favour these adequacies, complementary mechanisms should be considered like the development of professionals' skills-based profiles of the management.
