The phrase "adequacy of the sampling" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, statistics, or data collection, where the quality or sufficiency of a sample is being evaluated.
Example: "The adequacy of the sampling was assessed to ensure that the results would be representative of the entire population."
Alternatives: "sufficiency of the sample" or "quality of the sampling".
False positive probability, defined as the probability of failure to meet the minimum necessary requirement in future samples even when the tested sample satisfies the acceptance criteria in fact were used to evaluate the adequacy of the sampling regimen and acceptance criteria.
The adequacy of the sampling was assessed with Tracer [ 50] using the Effective Sample Size diagnostic (Additional file 2).
In Australia, for the last decade, the coverage of households with a telephone connected (landline) and the adequacy of the sampling frame(s) have been a concern for those involved in epidemiologically-sound telephone surveys.
In these cases frozen sections are required to assess the adequacy of the sampling location; if available, intraoperative imaging can also be used to correct the needle position relative to the intended target and can be of invaluable help in very small lesions.
The quality of the design, methodology, statistical analysis and conclusions, and the adequacy of the sample size were assessed for all identifiable clinical RCTs.
The adequacy of the sample size, or the 'sample power', to detect an effect or difference can often be estimated a priori using statistical power analyses or alternative Bayesian approaches [6].
The application of these methods faces similar challenges in these very similar contexts: ensuring the representativeness and adequacy of the sample, and again keeping the costs of sampling under control.
Touch imprint cytology (TIC) can be performed at the time of a biopsy to assess the adequacy of the sample; however, limited information is available on the diagnostic value of TIC of these specimens.
To assess the adequacy of the samples for the analyses of diet variability, the cumulative number of prey types identified, and cumulative diversity of the categorised stomach contents measured using the Brillouin index of diversity (H), were plotted against the cumulative number of non-empty stomachs [32].
We calculated the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measamplef sadequacyequacy (KMO) to establish the adequacy of the sample for factor analysis [ 23].
