The phrase "adequacy of interpretations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the sufficiency or appropriateness of various interpretations of a text, situation, or concept.
Example: "The adequacy of interpretations in literary analysis often depends on the reader's perspective and background knowledge."
Alternatives: "sufficiency of interpretations" or "validity of interpretations".
Pervasive global declines in habitat quantity and quality, with their implications for human wellbeing through loss of ecosystem services, raise questions about the adequacy of interpretations of sustainable development that fail to recognise the need not merely to reduce pressures upon but to actively regenerate the supportive capacities of damaged ecosystems.
We adhere to the theoretical definition of validity proposed by Messick (1989, 1995), that is, validity is the overall evaluative degree to which empirical evidence supports the adequacy of interpretations and actions/scores or other modes of assessment.
This complaint is, admittedly, not independent of more general complaints about the adequacy of these interpretations.
In addtion, recent studies of the Catholic reception of Kant's work (Fischer 2005) have put into question the adequacy of the interpretation on which neo-scholastic and neo-Thomist thinkers judged Kant's crtical project to be a subjectivist and relativist enterprise that stands in inplacable opposition to Catholic theology.
In other words, although there may be different sources and mixes of validity evidence for supporting the adequacy and appropriateness of interpretations of scores in different situations, validity is seen a unitary concept in modern validity theory [ 33].
This study was designed to determine the adequacy of chest radiograph interpretations by pediatric intensivists and the effects on patient care.
Whole slide imaging (WSI) has been suggested as a potential method of overcoming these limitations in the current glass slide consultation practice, but there have been concerns regarding the adequacy of image quality for interpretation of challenging dermatopathology cases.
Here we report the results of a psychometric analysis conducted to evaluate the adequacy and interpretation of FSS scores as a self-report measure of fatigue for clinical trials in patients with cHCV infection.
First, however, let us list some criteria of adequacy for such interpretations.
This particular FEA is evaluated with regard to 1) the nature of the A. africanus cranial composite, 2) model validation, 3) decisions made with respect to model parameters, 4) adequacy of data presentation, and 5) interpretation of the results.
There is currently no established method for judging conceptual richness of which we are aware, although Popay, Rogers and Williams' [ 41] identified several criteria for judging the adequacy of the primary study authors' interpretation of the subjective meaning of research participants – with subjective meaning being proposed as a 'primary marker' of the quality of qualitative papers.
