The phrase "adequacy group" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to assessments, evaluations, or classifications where a group is deemed sufficient or satisfactory for a particular purpose.
Example: "The adequacy group for this study was determined based on the criteria established in the initial phase of the research."
Alternatives: "sufficiency group" or "competence group".
Using a precedence from To et al [ 19], IA was dichotomized by combining the lowest and lower income adequacy categories to indicate (0 = low income adequacy), while the middle, upper middle and highest income adequacy groups were combined to indicate (1 = high income adequacy) [ 19].
In this study, which used data from a population-based, national survey conducted in 1998 1999, we found smoking prevalence to be high for particular subgroups of both women and men that have previously been identified in the literature: younger age groups, lower income adequacy groups and lone-parent households.
There was no difference in dialysis adequacy between groups [ 29].
Despite re-establishment of hemodynamic adequacy in PPV group and although ventilatory parameters were similar in both groups over time, resuscitation as performed in the study induced significant changes in tidal impedance toward nondependent lung regions, implying greater lung impairment in treated animals.
Quality was scrutinised by checking adequacy of randomisation, group comparability at baseline (examining baseline characteristics for any substantive differences), blinding (where appropriate), use of intention to treat analysis, completeness of follow-up, compliance, reliability by using a priori estimation of sample size, and generalisability by using a description of the sample recruited.
We used cluster analysis to justify, and statistically demonstrate, the adequacy of age-groups formed.
Adequacy of case groups was considered if demographical and clinical data were reported in sufficient detail in the text and/or a table.
This study aims to investigate the nutritional adequacy of this patient group.
The sampling adequacy of the food group variables for factor analysis was confirmed using the Kaiser Meyer Olkin measure.
The predominant human evidence came from cross-sectional studies conducted in the former Soviet Union.These studies were difficult to evaluate due to incomplete reporting and had obvious limitations in terms of subject selection, exposure assessment,lack of quality control, statistical analysis, adequacy of the comparison group, and confounding.
