The phrase "addressing the ability of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing or focusing on someone's or something's capability or skill in a particular context.
Example: "The report is addressing the ability of the new software to improve productivity in the workplace."
Alternatives: "focusing on the capability of" or "considering the potential of".
No, what's most important is addressing the ability of the I.R.S. to use its power for partisan political ends.
All previous studies addressing the ability of CT scan to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) were based on historical patients treated with limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).
In such cases, network pharmacology approaches are highly useful, because they differ from conventional drug discovery by addressing the ability of drugs to target numerous proteins or networks involved in a disease.
Previous work addressing the ability of cognitive networks to support SUs' requirements concentrated on using information theory to analyze the capacity of CRs.
The results of these studies should add to the growing literature addressing the ability of the media to alter judgments of severity and risk.
Despite the simplicity of this statement, few reports are really addressing the ability of these factors to modulate gut microbiota composition.
Previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that pDCs can suppress HIV replication in various cell line systems [25], [27]; however, our data provide a physiologic context for these prior observations by directly addressing the abilities of pDCs from HIV-infected individuals to suppress endogenous viral replication.
No randomized, placebo-controlled study has addressed the ability of NO administration to reduce mortality.
This study addresses the ability of planktonic Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria to colonize surfaces with pre-adsorbed AgNPs.
This paper addresses the ability of for-profit postsecondary programs to meet the current and future needs of our country's educational system and labor market.
But the case is actually immensely important, because it addresses the ability of the President — especially this President — to exercise the basic responsibilities of office in the face of flagrant obstruction by the Senate.
