The phrase "addressing resilience" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing strategies, approaches, or actions taken to enhance or respond to resilience in various contexts, such as psychology, environmental science, or community development.
Example: "The workshop will focus on addressing resilience in urban planning to better prepare cities for climate change."
Alternatives: "tackling resilience" or "fostering resilience".
Three levels of analysis are presented: (1) macro-level analysis comparing the number of measures strictly addressing resilience versus sustainability, (2) meso-level analysis of the coverage of types of hazards within SAFs (e.g. flood, fire), and (3) micro-level analysis of SAF measures connected to flood-related hazard resilience.
The past 10 15 years have seen a significant increase in the number of studies addressing resilience issues at community level from a variety of perspectives, and although the resilience of communities in dealing with disturbance feature strongly in these studies, less work appears to have been undertaken at the interface between community resilience and land degradation.
President Obama's Climate Action Plan, released last summer, was a step in the right direction, and there are small initiatives already underway addressing resilience and preparing for climate impacts.
As far as we know, there is no epidemiological study in Brazil addressing resilience to traumatic events among adults in the general population.
Elsewhere, in addressing resilience Redman and Kinzig (2003) highlight how institutions that mediate human-environmental interactions emerge, what influences their character, and their effectiveness in mitigating the consequences of natural or man-made disasters.
If we don't start to seriously address resilience this year, we will lose the momentum established last year.
The latter may address resilience by including "self-help" in the German law (ZSKG).
This article addresses resilience and vulnerability as two prominent concepts within disaster risk science.
To address resilience and issues of equity, a systems approach to policy design and evaluation is recommended.
The methodology is largely consistent with the Swiss approach as described above, but remains equally vague with respect to how the vulnerability analysis is carried out, and does not address resilience specifically.
We consider the Network Design Problem with Vulnerability Constraints (NDPVC) which simultaneously addresses resilience against failures (network survivability) and bounds on the lengths of each communication path (hop constraints).
