The phrase "addresses compared to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when making a comparison between different addresses or locations, often in a context discussing differences or similarities.
Example: "The report addresses compared to the previous year show a significant increase in foot traffic."
Alternatives: "compared with" or "in comparison to".
One possibility is that X can simply choose the nodes with the next higher (or lower) IP addresses compared to its own.
The adjusted odds ratio for non-or partial-industry funded trials providing e-mail addresses compared to industry trials was 9.6 (95% CI: 6.6 14).
The county E911 data converted 89% of the eligible addresses compared to 35% by ZP4 LACS.
For example, the state without lead laws, tended to on average, have more privately owned rental and owner occupied addresses compared to the lead law states.
This is further supported by the fact that TeleAtlas geocoded only 20 of 35 post-E911 converted street addresses compared to 34 of 37 pre-E911 converted street addresses.
Notably, the total trading volume fell despite a small increase in the number of unique addresses for the month – leading to a sharper decline in average transaction volume per unique address compared to August 2018.
However, African American patients and families more frequently identified the influence of RRTs on personal relationships and finances as important factors to address compared to non-African Americans.
28 It is possible that more elderly persons do not have internet or an email address compared to younger persons, which could have led to a selection of younger persons.
In consultations in which the patient initiated the discussion of a harm, a median of two more benefits/harms were addressed compared to consultations with more passive patients (median=8 vs 6, P<0.05).
The return rate was higher among those sent to a new address, compared to those identified with no address change among women residing in the high population density region (47% vs. 4%, p <.0001), but not among those residing in the low population density region (8% vs. 4%, p = 0.12).
One could argue that this additional cluster that was detected using individual addresses in 1996 (and not detected by census tract centroids) is evidence that supports overall better performance with individual addresses (as compared to census tract centroids), with confirmed p9 outbreaks.
