The phrase "addressed evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evidence that has been specifically dealt with or responded to in a particular context, such as a report or an argument.
Example: "In the report, the addressed evidence clearly supports the conclusion drawn by the researchers."
Alternatives: "considered evidence" or "responded to evidence".
The validity of an article was determined by a series of six questions that addressed evidence-based principles (Table 1) [ 32].
Further investment in intervention design and assessment is needed to address evidence gaps.
Nor did he address evidence that he and other executives had suppressed or rewritten audits that would have alerted Bentonville to improper payments.
They also strongly advised the industry to provide unbiased material on the products that addresses evidence of nutritional support, product safety for its intended use, and safety of dosages.
The episode taught him that "questions of honor are raised as much by appearances as by reality in politics," he wrote, "and because they incite public distrust they need to be addressed no less directly than we would address evidence of expressly illegal corruption".
Despite repeated warnings by the Chamber to use his time to address evidence in relation to all three indictments against him, Milošević had led almost entirely Kosovo-related evidence (Prosecutor v. Milošević 12 December 2005, para. 16).
This article has been slightly edited for space; subscribe to The Washington Spectator to read the second part of this report, addressing evidence of corruption that Thomas Drake turned over to investigators.
Evidence mapping complements other review methods for describing existing research, informing future research efforts, and addressing evidence gaps.
Moreover, main HPSR priorities were identified which can be translated into specific research questions to address evidence.
More research is needed to address evidence gaps regarding the current level of provision, longer-term effectiveness and questions of implementation, engagement and equity.
Others have argued that a single system cannot adequately address evidence across a wide range of contexts without being too complex to be useful [ 25, 26].
