The phrase "addressed equal" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to something being treated as equal or having equal status, but as it stands, it lacks clarity and grammatical structure.
Example: "In our discussions, we must ensure that all opinions are addressed equally to foster a collaborative environment."
Alternatives: "treated equally" or "considered equal".
The school board is to meet this month to consider a policy that addresses equal access for groups wanting to distribute materials in schools.
Some of the lawmakers in Congress who have championed legislation to address equal pay for women and paid family and medical leave quickly responded to the survey.
Almost a century since women's suffrage, it's insulting to address equal pay, reproductive rights and topics surrounding the home and children as issues solely relating to women, when they have consequences for men as well.
A bill to raise the minimum wage, Pelosi said, might be gaining enough political momentum and public support to make it viable in the Republican-controlled House -- but leadership is not likely to bring bills to the floor any time soon that would address equal pay for women or paid family and medical leave.
She, in turn, is not sure how to address equals, other academics, whom she does not know, in a first e-mail.
It is also aware of the internal issues that need to be addressed for equal opportunity to be achieved".
On the contrary, other forces undermining trust in his government -- widespread environmental problems, high and rising levels of inequality, and private-sector fraud -- need to be addressed with equal vigor.
Also, parents to children born with a CL might need to receive more support and their concerns about their children's well-being may need to be addressed with equal gravity as parents' concerns when a child is born with other types of OFC.
Because the Bowers v. Hardwick decision did not address equal protection, instead rejecting an argument based on the right to privacy, such a decision would not necessarily require the court to overrule the 1986 precedent.
