The phrase "address infringement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to legal matters, intellectual property, or any situation where a violation or breach needs to be discussed or resolved.
Example: "The company has taken steps to address infringement of its copyright by sending cease and desist letters to the offenders."
Alternatives: "tackle violations" or "resolve breaches".
"Elsevier and ACS, as two representative organizations from the coalition, filed a suit in Germany to ask for the courts to address the infringement that we could see," he tells The Scientist.
A new idea for IP: Addressing the thorny issue of how the United States should address online infringement, lawmakers have introduced a bipartisan, bicameral proposal that would give the International Trade Commission the authority to launch investigations into digital imports, or downloads, of counterfeit goods.
They also spend billions of dollars to address possible infringements, according to a 2011 report by the U.S. International Trade Commission.
Despite its importance to copyright holders, online service providers, and Internet speakers, very little empirical research has been done on how effective section 512 is for addressing copyright infringement, spurring online service provider development, or providing due process for notice targets.
"There are some service-led providers that use some technology to address IP infringements, but no one uses a tech-ed solution like we do".
The Rule of Law Framework will be activated where there are clear indications of a systemic threat to the rule of law in a Member State, in particular in situations which cannot be effectively addressed by infringement procedures and if the 'rule of law safeguards' which exist at national level no longer seem capable of effectively addressing these threats.
In a statement on Wednesday about the name change, RIM did not address the trademark infringement action by Basis International.
"ResearchGate continues to reject the viable long-term solutions we have proposed to address the copyright infringement on its site," he adds.
The sole purpose of the Court's inquiry has been to determine whether the use of the "planned parenthood" mark as defendant's domain name and home page address constitutes an infringement of plaintiff's trademark.
By then, the company may no longer exist: Michael Rollins, analyst with Citigroup the bank that led Vonage's ill-fated IPO last year wrote in a March 26 note that "failing to successfully address the patent infringement suits" could force Vonage into "a financial restructuring or bankruptcy" in one or two years.
