The phrase "address in support" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a speech or written communication that aims to provide support for a particular argument, cause, or individual.
Example: "During the meeting, she delivered an address in support of the new policy changes that would benefit the community."
Alternatives: "speech in favor" or "presentation supporting".
The Speech was the speech that Reagan gave on prime-time television on October 27 , 1964— fifty years ago this week — as a campaign address in support of Barry Goldwater, the Republican Presidential nominee.
The Speech was the speech that Reagan gave on prime-time television on October 27, 1964 fifty years ago this week as a campaign address in support of Barry Goldwater, the Republican Presidential nominee.
TRUE: Clinton did use the term "super predators" in a 1996 New Hampshire address in support of the 1994 Violent Crime Control Act.
Early last week, Tillerson, a former Exxon Mobil chief executive, delivered a long address in support of Europe in Washington more akin to traditional U.S. policy.
While Eva did make radio addresses in support of women's suffrage and also published articles in her Democracia newspaper asking male Peronists to support women's right to vote, ultimately the ability to grant to women the right to vote was beyond Eva's powers.
Secondary research questions will be addressed in support of this objective: Is any impact on mental health associated with a change in levels of engagement with the woodland environment (physical and/or visual) after WIAT intervention?
Muhammad Badie, the supreme guide of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, which also holds the country's presidency in the person of Muhammad Morsi, gave the welcome address, seemingly in support of Mr Meshal.In this section Will the new centre hold?
May. 7, 2018, 3 51 p.m. California Sen. Kamala Harris has canceled plans to deliver UC Berkeley's commencement address this weekend in support of UC workers who are on strike over wages and health benefits.
Given the weak experimental approach (which we agreed not to ask them to change) I don't think it's unreasonable to at least ask them to fully address evidence in support or in conflict with the idea that the RGG box has a relevant biologic role, to validate their experiments that speak to its function.
Given the weak experimental approach (which we agreed not to ask them to change) I don't think it's unreasonable to at least ask them to fully address evidence in support or in conflict with the idea that the RGG box has an a relevant biologic role to validate their experiments that speak to its function.
