The phrase "address environmental impacts" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the need to consider or respond to the effects that actions or policies have on the environment.
Example: "The new policy aims to address environmental impacts by promoting sustainable practices in the industry."
Alternatives: "tackle environmental effects" or "mitigate ecological consequences".
The organisation, which represents council transport chiefs, said the mitigation measures to address environmental impacts of the scheme must not be underestimated and HS2 had to learn from previous schemes including HS1.
The failure of past charcoal policies to address environmental impacts and achieve sustainability can be attributed to erroneous assumptions and predictions by national and international organizations regarding wood-based fuels.
So much money, time, and effort could have been saved with regulations that preempt or quickly address environmental impacts.
Critics advocate a shift in government policy to address environmental impacts by constraining the growth in demand for air travel, primarily through the use of economic instruments to price air travel less attractively.
While the book focused on ancient civilizations, the majority of the film addresses environmental impacts of our current 'global civilization', including the impact of concentrating wealth in the hands of the 'financial class'.
Another study which is critical of the government approach, and which favours addressing environmental impacts through increased taxation of air transport, indicates a negative economic benefit resulting from airport expansion.
The 2008 Libreville Declaration on Health and Environment in Africa, aimed at addressing environmental impacts on environmental change on health in the region (WHO/UNEP 2008), and a number of local and national initiatives in the Americas were also discussed at length to derive a set of recommendations to promote further integration of biodiversity and health policies.
However, while these early systems moved human waste downstream and away from cities, they rarely addressed environmental impact.
At the project level, evaluations must address environmental quality, impacts on livelihoods, health, household economies, and the overall cost and acceptability of the action.
In February 2002, the Appellate Division of State Supreme Court annulled the town zoning change, ruling that an environmental study prepared by the developer and accepted by the town did not address the environmental impacts of the houses the zoning change would allow.
To partly address these environmental impacts, many municipalities have begun using liquid brines or rock salt with alternative, plant-based additives – such as beet juice – that have very low freezing temperatures.
