The phrase "address carbon dioxide" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing environmental issues, climate change, or strategies for reducing carbon emissions.
Example: "To combat climate change effectively, we must address carbon dioxide emissions from various sources."
Alternatives: "tackle carbon dioxide" or "deal with carbon dioxide".
It will not address carbon dioxide emissions.
Nor did she directly answer questions on whether and how the agency would address carbon dioxide regulation under the Clean Air Act, an authority granted the agency by the Supreme Court in 2007.
The administration urged the Supreme Court to set aside the appeals court ruling and send the case back to New York for further proceedings to consider recent actions by the Environmental Protection Agency to address carbon dioxide emissions.
At this point, according to NOAA's Coral Reef Conservation Program, a failure to address carbon dioxide emissions and the impacts of climate change could in the long term "make many other management efforts futile".
When this lawsuit began seven years ago, one of the defendants' main defenses was that, because the Clean Air Act and other laws "address" carbon dioxide emissions, Congress has "legislated on the subject" and pre-empted the suit.
It is because of the significant economic and political advantages of cap-and-trade systems to address carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions that most (but not all) attention by policy makers has been focused on this policy approach.
Unlike Mr. Burke's proposal, Mr. Moore's addresses carbon dioxide emissions — which scientists see as the main culprit in climate change — along with pollutants that pose an immediate health risk.
You can also meaningfully address the carbon dioxide emissions that your daily activities unavoidably generate through the life changing, accountable and transparent income streams for the poorest communities on Earth.
He soon became aware of the possibility of applying his research to CCS. "I was attracted by the possibility of doing something positive to address rising carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion," he says.
The court's ruling on the one hand reaffirmed that the federal environmental agency has the tools to address emissions of carbon dioxide.
The administration proposal addresses all but carbon dioxide, while the Jeffords bill, as well as a less aggressive measure proposed by Senator Thomas R. Carper, Democrat of Delaware, and two Republican senators, Judd Gregg of New Hampshire and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, provide for limits on all four pollutants.
