Sentence examples for address a risk from inspiring English sources
The phrase "address a risk" is correct and usable in written English.
It means to take measures to deal with or mitigate a potential danger or problem. It is often used in business or professional contexts to discuss risk management. Example: "In order to successfully launch our new product, we need to address the risk of potential competitors entering the market. This could include developing a unique marketing strategy and securing strong patents for our product design."
Requirements that get OIRA's stamp of approval are also more likely to be the least burdensome way to address a risk.
An organization without a risk management program ignores potential threats and is unprepared to address a risk that is realized; one with an individualized program identifies risks and improves its operation by managing them.
Risk management lays out the approaches needed to address a risk.
One model is the SEC's response to Y2K, which effectively used disclosure as a means to cajole companies to address a risk not just to the bottom line but to the national interest.
If effective measures to address a risk would be available but the risk is virtually unpredictable, a mix of anticipatory and resilience-focused approaches is commendable.
The problem may instead lie with the programme or service, or relate specifically to the suitability of a drug that is currently being used to address a risk factor, disease or condition.
Kyrgyzstan took a weekly RFE/RL television show off the air last year, while Uzbekistan aired a documentary identifying its employees and giving their families' addresses, a risk in a country whose government harasses independent journalists and politicians.
It was decided that the main focus of the discussions would be on functional foods, partly for practical reasons and because functional foods suggest a beneficial effect in the general population addressing a risk factor for future morbidity.
Because of this criterion, EO 13045 applied to only 15 of the 80 regulations that were health-or safety-based and addressed a risk that may disproportionately impact children.
However, we do not recommend transposing the FCTC in its entirety to develop the new framework since there would be inherent differences between the two, mainly that the FCTC addresses a risk factor while our proposed framework focuses on a disease.
Some scepticism is warranted, given that risks are not taken into account, apart from 'fixes' that address a single risk.
