The phrase "additional permits for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to extra permissions or licenses required for a specific purpose or activity.
Example: "Before starting the construction project, we need to apply for additional permits for the environmental impact assessment."
Alternatives: "extra permits for" or "supplementary permits for".
For example, California's cap-and-trade system, under Assembly Bill 32, has a feature wherein if the price of permits rises above a certain level, then companies can buy any number of additional permits for that cost.
Additional permits for the rally were taken out by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and two additional anti-Kerry veterans groups, all of which gave their address as the local Republican party headquarters and their contact as a member of the party's executive committee.
The auction, which would give the licence-winners exclusive rights to explore an area for oil and gas, but would require additional permits for fracking, would add to the 19,000 square kilometres of licences that have already been sold to hydrocarbon producers.
Cases of compulsory uses for other purposes were defined in Article 20 of Bni Brak Local Council Regulations which requires for an additional permit for utilization of domestic water for other purposes like agriculture or industry [10]. 7.
(15) Any additional permits, such as for hot work, that have been issued to authorize work in the permit space.
Uber, founded in the United States and headquartered in San Francisco, had argued that it was simply an intermediary technology company that should not be subject to transportation regulation, which could entail additional permit requirements for the company, licensing requirements for drivers, and caps on the number of vehicles it puts on the road.
In their objections, the environmental groups note that the mines in question, in all but one case, exceeded the 10-year limit years ago, and have merely applied for additional permits.
First, project developers or offset buyers could individually retain liability for future carbon loss, in which case those entities would be responsible for purchasing additional permits ex post, whenever sequestered carbon was shown (through monitoring) to have escaped.
Could the police have better use for their time than reviewing additional permits and negotiating with business owners the terms for this new permit?
They also require additional permits and time.
The additional permits could cost thousands of dollars.
