The phrase "additional harvest" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an extra or supplementary collection of crops or resources.
Example: "The farmers were pleased to report an additional harvest this season, thanks to the favorable weather conditions."
Alternatives: "extra yield" or "supplementary crop".
In addition, exploited fish populations have also been heavily stocked for decades to provide additional harvest opportunities in overexploited populations (Waples 1999; Helfman 2007).
After the original harvest, re-entry of stands for additional harvest focused mainly on hardwoods may be economically rewarding and ecologically justified, depending on the overall objectives for retention.
If only 50% of additional harvest is saw log, the IR would be 6% and with 25% share of saw log the IR would be 4%.
For further testing of the model, additional harvest and weather data (7 years) from two farms in Lower Saxony (Hedeper and Trögen) were used.
Considering the mitigation effects of climate change by forests, it emerges that the increase in standing volume of forests in Romania is smaller than the additional harvest in Germany which serves fossil fuel substitution.
For example, pre-2009 policies allowing increasing harvest up to a certain % of the increment, or planning new biomass power plants (which require additional harvest), were included in some reference levels [20].
We demonstrated several additional harvesting scenarios that avoided the potential risk and produced a much higher level of forage than currently exists.
Surgeons therefore should consider using this technique in order to minimize the use of bone substitutes without additional harvesting morbidity.
In Fig. 1, we display the carbon content of world forests 100 years into the future, assuming constant (present) rates of deforestation and expansion without additional harvesting.
For B1 in the time span 2010 2100 this makes additional harvests of 40 tC/ha when maximising increment compared to maximising standing carbon.
Modifications to harvesting area and rotation age are based on the decision-making of forest owners and a harvesting operational schedule, so the modification of these factors does not raise tangible costs, such as additional harvesting equipment expenses or labour costs.
