Sentence examples for additional disagreement from inspiring English sources

The working group leader or even the group itself must decide when a consensus has been reached (although this can create additional disagreement when consensus cannot be reached about coming to a consensus).

Given the tendency of thermodynamicists to argue, in all probability, the discussions will lead to additional disagreements.

Additional disagreements were observed with 4 samples giving false positive values using plasma VFA as compared to VLref.

Where there are additional disagreements among genes, the support values are weak, suggesting a lack of signal rather than non-orthology.

The differences between NCYC3585 and YJM1450 (alias 273614N) were 3 indels, including 2 singletons and a 7 bp indel (<0.0002 % disagreement, Additional file 1: Table S1).

When parents reported more symptoms and impact, low educational level of the parent, low income and male gender of the child, were additional predictors of disagreement.

However, location categories (" Outdoors" and " In-Transit") where less time is spent show greater disagreement (Additional file 1: Table S3); for example, mean time " Indoors-Other" using the time-activity diary was 14.4% compared to 9.8% using the automated method, and the sensitivity (for Indoors-Other) was 28.8% but had a specificity of 98.8%.

The one aim with a moderate level of disagreement (Additional file 1, aim 1.2) used the term 'care on demand'vraaggestuurdurd'), which is used by Dutch policy makers to indicate that the patient is central to care as opposed to 'care as supplied'aanbodbod gestuurd') which prioritises the habits, rules and regulations of the institution delivering it.

Data producers may use the areas of spatial agreement for training area selection while users might need to verify the information in the areas of disagreement using additional data sources.

We presented this framework to the expert panel using a similar question format to the first round with the aim of determining whether there was agreement with the content, reasons for any divergence or disagreement, whether additional strategic information categories were required, and to allow further comment or clarification on these categories.

Two physician reviewers blindly evaluated patient understanding using pre-specified rubric (see Additional file 2); any disagreements were resolved by consensus.