The phrase "added we note that" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a combination of two phrases, which makes it awkward and unclear.
Example: "In our report, we added we note that the findings were significant."
Alternatives: "we also note that" or "we would like to point out that".
It added: "We noted that the claim was a general one regarding the importance of UV as a source of vitamin D and that it did not go into detail about the risks of over-exposure to UV, from either sunlight or sunbeds.
"We reiterate our call for a return to civilian rule and the holding of free, fair and transparent elections as soon as possible," Mr. McCormack said, adding, "We note that at the time of President Conté's death, Guinea was preparing for legislative elections in early 2009".
There may well be a problem of phospholipids not competing ideally with sterols when together added in methanol, although we note that this can only be quantitative, not qualitative, since PLs bound well to E-Syt2 (in preference to sterol) using precisely this approach (Schauder et al., Nature 2014).
French foreign ministry spokesman Philippe Lalliot added his concern, but said: "We note that not all judicial remedies have been exhausted and that the sentence could be reviewed on appeal".
We note that adding dominated points to does not change the value of optimization problem (14), which allows us to consider problem (A.1)–(A.6) instead.
We note that adding a shift/hinge has an overhead which must pay for itself with a better fit if it is to be accepted.
We added a sentence: "In this regard, we note that previous studies demonstrated a role for NMDA receptors in olfactory memory (Wu et al., 2007, Miyashita et al., 2012)." The other literature that I think is given short shrift is a bulk of data on the effects of internal state (satiety) on reward learning via monoaminergic modulation of MB.
The Montana Supreme Court decision referred to "the shadowy backers of WTP" and added, "We take note that Western Tradition appears to be engaged in a multi-front attack on both contribution restrictions and the transparency that accompanies campaign disclosure requirements".
In the figure legend, we added the following comment: "Note that Jen1-GFP is expressed at a lower level in the triple ypt6Δ gga1Δ gga2Δ mutant, therefore samples were loaded so that a comparable signal is observed in each strain".
Note that, we add the fingerprint-based estimation without data cleansing and compensation.
