added later

USAGE SUMMARY

"added later" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that the following information was not part of the original message. For example: "We had agreed to meet at the park, but I forgot to mention that I wanted to bring a friend. Added later: I'll also bring some snacks for everyone."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Syria was added later.

The Economist

Patients' names were added later.

The New York Times - Health

Horse races were added later.

The New Yorker

(Two letters were added later).

Encyclopedia Britannica

A "footnote" was added later.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Africa may be added later.

The New York Times

Was the date added later?

The New York Times

A conservatory was added later.

The New York Times

Title below image added later.

Yale University

He added later: "Yeah, it's motivation.

The New York Times

He added later: "This is one game.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "added later" to clearly indicate that information was not part of the original content or plan. This avoids confusion and maintains clarity.

Common error

Ensure that when using "added later", the context clearly indicates what it refers to. Without proper context, it can be unclear what was added and when.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "added later" functions as an adverbial modifier. It typically modifies a clause or sentence, indicating when something was included or occurred in relation to a previous action or statement. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Academia

19%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "added later" is a versatile adverbial modifier used to indicate that information was included subsequently. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. With a "Very common" frequency, it appears most frequently in news and media, academic, and encyclopedia contexts. When writing, it's best to use "added later" to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity by ensuring the context is clear. Consider alternatives such as "subsequently included" or "late addition" for stylistic variation. Its neutral register makes it suitable for diverse communication styles.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

late addition

Simply emphasizes that something was added at a late point in time.

subsequently included

Focuses on the inclusion aspect, highlighting that something was incorporated at a later time.

incorporated subsequently

Highlights the integration of something into a larger whole at a later point.

appended afterwards

Emphasizes the action of adding something to the end, suggesting a sequential addition.

introduced at a later stage

Suggests a phased implementation or introduction of something.

supplemented later

Focuses on the idea of adding to something to enhance or complete it at a later time.

included retroactively

Implies that something was added with effect from a past date or time.

added in retrospect

Emphasizes that something was considered and added after an event or period.

subjoined subsequently

Indicates that something was connected or attached afterward, often in a formal context.

postscript addition

Refers to something added as an afterthought, similar to a postscript in a letter.

FAQs

How can I use "added later" in a sentence?

You can use "added later" to indicate information that wasn't initially included, for instance, "The initial plan was to meet at 2 PM. "Added later": I'll be bringing a friend".

What are some alternatives to "added later"?

Consider using phrases like "subsequently included", "appended afterwards", or "late addition" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "added later" formal or informal?

"Added later" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts, although more formal alternatives might be preferred in academic writing.

What's the difference between "added later" and "added afterwards"?

While similar, "added afterwards" more strongly emphasizes the sequence of events, while "added later" simply indicates a difference in time. They are often interchangeable, but context can influence the best choice.