The phrase "added implications of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing additional meanings or consequences that arise from a particular situation or statement.
Example: "The study revealed added implications of climate change on local ecosystems that had not been previously considered."
Alternatives: "additional consequences of" or "further implications of".
However, an added implication of our findings is that for patients with CsA trough levels at or modestly above the target limit, in the absence of CsA related toxicity, dose reduction should cautious in order to avoid low or subtherapeutic drug levels which can increase the risks of acute GVHD and early mortality.
The added implication is that the Davidic dynasty has inherited the blessings of the covenant.
Christina Semeniuk, an ecologist at Simon Fraser University in Canada, who led the research, said: "Our study is the first to definitively show negative physiological impacts that indicate long-term costs to the animals' health". She added: "The implications of these findings will not only affect the wildlife.
He added: "The implications of the growth in shale oil will be felt along the value chain.
So, in addition to the great diversity of corporate governance arrangements that already exist in advanced markets, we now have to add the implications of state-ownership and company group structures that often are important features of Asian listed companies.
She added that the implications of the research, and of studies by the International Energy Agency and others, were that a significant portion of the world's fossil fuel reserves would be "unburnable" if dangerous climate change is to be avoided.
Mr Russell added that the implications of the judgement would be referred to the Commission on the Delivery of Rural Education.
Finally, given that pied flycatchers share breeding cavities and parasites with many other species [31], the findings reported here may open new research agendas on the evolution of virulence and cospeciation of vectors, virus and vertebrate hosts in the wild [3] [6], [8], [32], [33], with added important potential implications of concern in conservation biology [34], [35].
Our rationale for considering pRKIP was that this level of protein regulation might yield added clinical implications especially in light of our observation that total RKIP was seemingly unchanged.
Our data add to the implications of these findings by providing clinical evidence that tophus resolution can be achieved in select patients within several months if UA is reduced to levels well below what has been achieved to date with oral agents.
