The phrase "added eligibility" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an increase or enhancement in qualifications or criteria for a particular program, benefit, or opportunity.
Example: "The new policy includes added eligibility for applicants who have completed additional training."
Alternatives: "increased eligibility" or "enhanced eligibility".
First, it added eligibility for all adults earning up to 138% of the poverty level (previously, eligibility was largely focused on the very poor, single mothers, and the disabled).
Main outcome measure Proportion of matching, missing, modified, or newly added eligibility criteria between trial protocols and subsequent publications.
Most of the missing eligibility criteria (96%, 94% to 97%) and modified eligibility criteria (54%, 46%to62%2%) suggested broader study populations and most of the added eligibility criteria (86%, 74%to94%4%) suggested narrower study populations.
In response, the judge read a less-explicit portion of the statute providing that "life imprisonment means until death of the offender," and added: "Parole eligibility or ineligibility is not for your consideration".
For example, in 1979 respondents who reported any work outside the home in the past year were included in the question universe while later years added further eligibility restrictions (e.g., work ≥ 20 hours per week)3.
The House bill stripped out protections for LGBT victims of abuse, it didn't give tribal courts new authority in certain domestic violence cases, and it added new eligibility restrictions for U visas for abused immigrant women.
Should federal and state law change to require additional eligibility criteria, those requirements would be added to the eligibility determination process and we would follow that law".
First, they added eight new eligibilities to the three that had been there for 27 years.
Roy Trudel, technical director of federal Medicaid eligibility policy, added, "You could argue that there is a shortcoming in the statute there".
"We think of ourselves not as a comparison of products, but as a comparison of eligibility," he added.
Attempts to make residency a requirement for benefit eligibility adds to this concern (e.g. Saenz v. Roe 1999; Maldonado v. Houston 1997).
