The phrase "adaptation frequency and" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to biology, ecology, or any field discussing changes in frequency of adaptations over time.
Example: "The study focused on the adaptation frequency and its impact on species survival in changing environments."
Alternatives: "rate of adaptation" or "frequency of adaptation".
The selection of the several algorithm components, i.e., grid placement criterion, spatial discretization scheme, time integrator, adaptation frequency, and parameter tuning, are investigated and illustrated with several test examples, i.e., the cubic Schrödinger equation, a model of a single-step reaction with diffusion, and a model of flame propagation.
Hence, 1.1 kHz represented the adaptation frequency and 80° represented the adaptation position.
The latter two conditions qualitatively agree with results of the two studies [ 12, 15] reporting significant aftereffect at the adaptation frequency and no transfer of aftereffect across sounds that differed by two octaves.
As intensity increased (= 18), a stronger aftereffect occurred at the adaptation frequency (≈ 2.49°) and aftereffect is generalized approximately across one-octave range.
After each adaptation phase, the network was tested to assess the perceptual shift due to ventriloquism aftereffect and its generalization over frequency, by applying an auditory stimulus (test stimulus) at the adaptation position and either at the adaptation frequency or at a different frequency.
Weak effects were observed with test gratings approaching about 2 octaves below and 1·25 octaves above the adaptation frequency.
As an example, the neuron at three octaves apart from the adaptation frequency exhibited synapses modification only in case of E0 a adapt = 20 (compare Figures 8(k) and 9 k)).
Simulated patterns of aftereffect at high intensities (≥20) are in qualitative agreement with those observed in the studies by Frissen et al. [ 17, 18] reporting aftereffect generalization across two and even more octaves and observing a decreasing gradient as moving away from the adaptation frequency.
At a low sound intensity (= 17), a slight aftereffect (1.61°) occurred only at the adaptation frequency (see also Figure 9).
However, only rfa2 -D x cells display an adaptation frequency that is nearly indistinguishable from WT or rfa1 -t11 cells.
In particular, adaptation stimuli at higher intensities cause a stronger synaptic reinforcement, while test stimuli at higher intensities, even far from the adaptation frequency, can easily boost the synapses trained during the adaptation phase.
