The phrase "adaptability of bacteria" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the ability of bacteria to adjust to different environments or conditions.
Example: "The adaptability of bacteria allows them to survive in extreme conditions, making them a fascinating subject of study in microbiology."
Alternatives: "flexibility of bacteria" or "bacterial adaptability".
However, the increased resistance it does confer clearly demonstrates the tremendous adaptability of bacteria under antibiotic stress.
This study allowed us to correlate the phylogenetic and phenotypic profiles with a multiclonal origin, reflecting the process of adaptability of bacteria of the genus Stenotrophomonas to different habitats.
Positive selection studies on model bacteria, such as the species Escherichia coli[ 4, 6] and Listeria[ 7], or the genera Streptococcus[ 8, 9] and Campylobacter[ 10] have revealed that positive selection is an essential part of natural selection to fix advantageous mutations, and improves the adaptability of bacteria in a wide range of environmental conditions.
Recently, Beijing genotype bacteria were reported to carry mutations in putative mutator genes, which may explain a higher adaptability of these bacteria under stress conditions such as exposure to the intracellular environment or anti-TB drugs (13 ).
In conclusion, IS and prophages are a source of plasticity and adaptability of the bacteria to various environments, and the influence of transposable elements on two phenotypic traits in P. freudenreichii was illustrated by the formation of a capsular EPS and the ability to ferment lactose.
This cofactor is an essential element for diverse enzymes involved in protecting the cells against toxic compounds including ROS and increases the adaptability of psychrophilic bacteria to cope with low temperatures [ 22, 45].
However, the numerous regulatory proteins encoded within the GBS genome may reflect the adaptability of the bacterium.
Alterations in genes involved in the repair of DNA mutations (mut genes) result in an increased mutation frequency and better adaptability of the bacterium to stressful conditions.
The remarkable adaptability of this bacterium is partly modulated by transcriptional regulators that tailor gene expression to the conditions encountered, with a pivotal role being played by sigma factors that target RNA polymerase to specific promoter sequences [ 2].
This increase in genetic variability can be selected for during adaptation via second-order selection [41] and can result in an improved adaptability of the transduced bacteria [42].
We thus attempted to tackle this problem from the opposite direction: if we prevented the mutL to 6bpΔ mutL conversion when the 6bpΔ mutL genotype was predicted as necessary in a challenging growth environment, would adaptability of the modified bacteria be reduced compared to the wild type controls?
