Results of objective (i effort to adapt test sets were presented by Levin and Ferrari [27] and are summarised in section 'Effort to adapt test sets across paradigms'.
In order to dynamically adapt test generation behavior to actual path exploration performance, we define a suitable measure for quality evaluation of test cases.
Metrics and tool: The metrics we collected to evaluate the effort required to adapt test sets across paradigms focus on code churn.
Perspective (iii), on the other hand, consists of recent exploratory studies that analyse the effort to adapt test sets for refactored systems and the quality of such test sets in terms of structural coverage.
We report on the results of a recently performed exploratory study that measures the effort (in terms of code changes) required to adapt test suites from one paradigm to the other and vice versa.
As described by Levin and Ferrari [27], in this investigation, we wanted to study the effect of different programming paradigms on the effort required to migrate (i.e. adapt) test code from OO to AO programs and vice versa.
Differently from the analysis presented in section 'Effort to adapt test sets across paradigms', the p values obtained for the STATEMENT i and BRANCH i metrics are all above the defined threshold of 0.05.
The objective of this study was to adapt, test and evaluate a modified CDC PRAMS methodology in Ireland.
The dissimilar chemicals reviewed within this special issue are testament to the fact that similar disruptive effects can be produced by a wide range of chemical structures and failure to adapt testing to this fact is no longer acceptable (486).
