The phrase "adapt research" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the modification or adjustment of research methods, findings, or approaches to fit a specific context or need.
Example: "In order to address the unique challenges of our project, we need to adapt research from previous studies to better suit our objectives."
Alternatives: "modify research" or "tailor research".
As a primary researcher or graduate student, the ability to adapt research projects to take advantage of new technological and scientific developments in the field of cancer biology requires a broad knowledge of subjects outside the primary areas of research.
Chris Davis founded the Pemaquid Oyster Company in 1986 with five friends and was among the first to adapt research at the Darling center for commercial use.
Many refugees struggle to adapt; research three years ago found high unemployment rates and an average income of roughly half the average South Korean salary.
Translational social scientists adapt research for the people it aims to serve and carry the lessons they learn in the community back to the lab.
I could see findings being put to work, and the healthy debate about how to adapt research into practice was invigorating and challenging.
This should include the ability to adapt research in response to changing clinical environments and the changing needs of service users.
The use of basic science tools including cells, genes, and biomaterials that might be implanted in sites of cartilage lesions may open new avenues of clinically adapted research in orthopaedic surgery.
The nature of the literature was classified as: a) original research, b) reviews, c) program descriptions and d) commentary/discussion paper using an adapted research identification schema [ 43].
This strategy demonstrates the potential of adapting research and business methods to local settings, rather than necessarily trying to change the local situation to fit an international market.
The results of innovative or adapted research were less likely to be supported by evidence from other studies, making it more difficult for researchers to argue a case for change, based on a single study alone.
Further, use of the PARiHS [ 10] and Knowledge to Action [ 11] Cycle frameworks drove elements of the program that were deemed important by participants, including: leadership support, provision of resources, and emphasis on adapting research evidence to support local needs.
