The phrase "actually observable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing phenomena or data that can be seen or measured in a tangible way.
Example: "The results of the experiment were actually observable, confirming the hypothesis."
Alternatives: "truly visible" or "genuinely detectable".
(The laser's beams are not actually observable to the human eye anyway, since it emits infrared light. As Dr. Ditmire put it: "It's too red. More red than red. So red you can't see them").
"Changes in walking may predate actually observable cognitive changes in people who are on their way to developing dementia," said Molly Wagster, chief of the National Institute on Aging's behavioral and systems neuroscience branch.
The advantage of this method lies in the use of the characteristic parameters that are actually observable in the process.
Another question arises in the real world (and also in our experiment), whether the compliance is actually observable and not only the concordance (see [7]).
Consider the claim 'x is observable' for some x that is never actually observed.
22.8 48.9 26.1 18 There is actually considerable observable evidence against evolution.
One result is something of a Potemkin village: government proclaims its full commitment to respecting the First Amendment without actually permitting any observable dissent to take place near the convention.
And the demand for the new product actually produces an observable surge in the US economy as measured by GDP in the month in question, legitimising all this futility in the eyes of those who are only satisfied if things can be "monetised", as the Americans put it.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the regression coefficients derived from a Tobit regression differ slightly in conceptual terms from those derived from a linear regression; Tobit coefficients are estimated taking into account the probability that a predictor is actually above the observable limit.
As time marches on, all possible universes implicit in all quantum equations describing every single particle in the currently observable universe actually do come into existence and each then splits in a similar way, and so on.Compared with even the weirdness of the Copenhagen interpretation, this is a mind-blowing idea.
If there were no dark energy, the observable would actually increase with time since as the universe gets older we would see out further and further.
